The AIHT Rating is our editorial score out of 100. Explore the published edition, compare component figures, and follow each rating to its review or reusable badge.
- Edition
- October 2026
- Rated tools
- 16
- Published
- Record type
- Editorial baseline
16 rated tools
Rank follows the overall AIHT Rating. Sorting a component changes the view, not the official rank. Scroll horizontally to see all columns.
| Rank | Humanizer | AIHT Rating | Detector figure | Meaning | Readability | Penalties | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Walter Writes AI | 89.6/100 | 94.5% | 88 | 100 | 0 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 2 |  Stealth Writer | 84.47/100 | 89.5% | 79.8 | 100 | -1 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 3 |  WriteHuman AI | 83.59/100 | 84.5% | 82.1 | 100 | 0 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 4 |  HIX Bypass | 83.52/100 | 85.2% | 80.4 | 100 | -1 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 5 |  Humbot AI | 80.28/100 | 76.9% | 84.3 | 100 | 0 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 6 |  Undetectable AI | 80.09/100 | 94.1% | 72.2 | 100 | -8 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 7 |  Bypass AI | 76.84/100 | 78.2% | 76.5 | 100 | -2 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 8 |  StealthGPT | 71.47/100 | 82.9% | 67.7 | 100 | -9 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 9 |  Phrasly AI | 71.1/100 | 76.9% | 71.4 | 100 | -6 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 10 |  BypassGPT | 69.31/100 | 71.3% | 73.8 | 100 | -4 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 11 |  GPTHumanizer | 65.82/100 | 68.4% | 70.1 | 100 | -3 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 12 |  Humanize AI | 64.19/100 | 66.1% | 69.8 | 100 | -4 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 13 |  GPTinf | 61.53/100 | 63.8% | 66.2 | 100 | -5 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 14 |  Ryne AI | 58.71/100 | 59.2% | 64.1 | 100 | -6 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 15 |  TextFix.ai | 55.88/100 | 56.3% | 62.4 | 100 | -7 | Cite / embed ↗ |
| 16 |  WriteHybrid | 52.14/100 | 52.8% | 58.9 | 100 | -8 | Cite / embed ↗ |
No matching tool. Try a shorter name.
Reading the board
What each metric means
AIHT Rating
The published editorial score on a 100-point scale. It determines rank. The original weighting formula is not available, so the displayed components cannot independently reproduce this edition's overall score.
Detector figure
The existing aggregate detector percentage retained from the comparison records. Sample counts, thresholds and run logs are not published. It is not a probability that a new passage will pass a detector.
Meaning preservation
The recorded component for retaining the input's meaning. Higher values represent a stronger assessment in the existing record. The underlying rubric and samples are unavailable for independent verification.
Readability
The recorded readability component. Several tools share 100; that does not establish perfect writing or statistically identical quality. Compare actual outputs before choosing.
Recorded penalties
Point deductions recorded with the original comparison values. They are already part of the historical record. Do not subtract them again from the displayed AIHT Rating.
Precision is not certainty
Decimals preserve the source values. They are not confidence intervals. Small differences cannot establish a meaningful performance advantage without sample-level evidence.
Publication record
What supports this edition
Published on 8 October 2026, this edition consolidates the site's existing comparison figures. It does not represent a new test cycle.
Read the full methodology →- Published
- Overall scores, component figures, tool reviews and edition-specific badges.
- Not published
- Source prompts and outputs, sample counts, detector versions, run logs and the original weighting formula.
- Before a new edition
- A dated record, supporting evidence and an explanation of rating changes are required. No trends are inferred from a single edition.