Skip to content
AIHT Rankings · October 2026 editorial edition Rankings →
AIHT AI Humanizer Tools Reviews & field notes
Methodology ↗

Head-to-head comparison

WriteHuman AI vs StealthGPT

WriteHuman AI rates higher overall in the October 2026 AIHT edition: 83.59/100 against 71.47 for StealthGPT (rank 3 and 8 of 16).

Compare the AIHT Ratings, detector figures and product features for these two tools, then read their individual reviews.

The stored scores do not establish which tool will produce the best rewrite for your draft.

Stored test date:Jun 2, 2026Listed sample size:305 detectors
WriteHuman AIwritehuman.ai ↗ Higher AIHT Rating
83.59AIHT Rating / 100
StealthGPTstealthgpt.ai ↗
71.47AIHT Rating / 100
Two manuscripts with different editorial annotations, shown side by side.

Look beyond the score

→

AIHT Rating records

Edition and evidence details for each tool’s overall AIHT Rating.

Swipe horizontally to compare the rating records →

Rating recordWriteHuman AIStealthGPT
Edition2026-102026-10
Methodeditorial-baseline-v1 · Methodologyeditorial-baseline-v1 · Methodology
SourceAIHT comparison scorecards, October 2026 edition.AIHT comparison scorecards, October 2026 edition.
EvidenceAIHT Rating is an editorial score out of 100. Read the methodology for rating definitions.AIHT Rating is an editorial score out of 100. Read the methodology for rating definitions.

Correction history

No corrections are recorded for this edition.No corrections are recorded for this edition.

Side-by-side scores

This scorecard records a 30-prompt sample and summaries for five detectors. Compare the detector values alongside meaning retention and readability.

WriteHuman AI 83.59
StealthGPT 71.47
Editorial rating · not a detector measurement
Data table

Swipe horizontally to compare all score columns →

MetricWriteHuman AIStealthGPTWinner
Overall Score83.5971.47WriteHuman AI
Bypass Rate84.5%82.9%WriteHuman AI
Meaning Preservation82.167.7WriteHuman AI
Readability100100Tie
Penalties0-9 (meaning drift, length inflation, length deflation)WriteHuman AI

Detector-by-detector results

This table compares the recorded figures for five detectors and highlights the higher value in each row.

DetectorWriteHuman AIStealthGPT

GPTZero

87.383.6

Proofademic

88.172.3

ZeroGPT

79.665.7

Copyleaks

81.283.3

Originality.ai

80.978.8
One input to a shortlist

Our verdict

Editor's assessment

WriteHuman AI is the stronger overall performer in this matchup. Its bypass rate (84.5%) is higher than StealthGPT's (82.9%), and it wins against 4 of the 5 detectors where there is a clear winner. It finishes 12.1 points ahead on overall score.

StealthGPT is not a bad tool. It holds a meaningful advantage against Copyleaks. However, its penalty load of 9 points (meaning drift, length inflation, length deflation) is significant, meaning it is more likely to alter what your text actually says.

For most use cases, WriteHuman AI is the better pick. The exception is workflows that specifically target Copyleaks, where StealthGPT's advantage gives it a genuine edge.

Plan details, checked 23 and 26 October 2026

Scroll horizontally to see all score columns.

ToolEntry planPrice as listedAllowanceLimitFree option
WriteHuman AIBasic$20/mo, or $12/mo billed $144 yearly80 requests/month600 words per requestFree plan: 3 requests/month, 250 words
StealthGPTPro$29.99/mo as displayed (monthly toggle)50,000 words/month1,000 words per requestNo free plan listed

Sources and evidence

Who should pick which

Different tools suit different workflows. Here is a practical breakdown of when each tool is the better fit:

Pick WriteHuman AI if...

  • You want the higher overall score and broader detector coverage
  • Raw bypass rate is your top priority (84.5% vs 82.9%)
  • Meaning preservation matters to your workflow
  • You want a free tier to test before subscribing
  • Budget matters and you want to compare entry plans first (see the plan details above)

Pick StealthGPT if...

  • You have tested it yourself and prefer its specific output style

Reviews and rankings

ComparisonWriteHuman AI vs Stealth WriterHow does WriteHuman AI compare against Stealth Writer? See the data.Open →ComparisonStealthGPT vs Stealth WriterSee how StealthGPT stacks up against Stealth Writer.Open →ReviewRead the WriteHuman AI reviewOpen →ReviewRead the StealthGPT reviewOpen →ComparisonStealthWriter vs WriteHuman AIRead the comparisonOpen →ComparisonStealthGPT vs WriteHybridExplore the AIHT RatingOpen →ComparisonWriteHuman AI vs WriteHybridExplore the AIHT RatingOpen →ComparisonStealthGPT vs TextFix.aiExplore the AIHT RatingOpen →ComparisonWriteHuman AI vs TextFix.aiExplore the AIHT RatingOpen →ComparisonStealthGPT vs Ryne AIExplore the AIHT RatingOpen →ComparisonHumbot AI vs StealthGPTExplore the AIHT RatingOpen →ComparisonStealthGPT vs BypassGPTExplore the AIHT RatingOpen →

Frequently asked questions

About WriteHuman AI vs StealthGPT

In this stored five-detector scorecard, WriteHuman AI scored 83.59 overall compared to StealthGPT at 71.47. WriteHuman AI wins on raw bypass rate (84.5% vs 82.9%) and leads on 4 of 5 detectors. The better choice depends on which specific detectors matter most to your workflow.

Next move

Use this comparison alongside the full reviews and our testing methodology before making a subscription decision. See the full ranking Read the WriteHuman AI review Read the StealthGPT review Looking for the best AI humanizer? We tested 16 tools head-to-head. See the full AI humanizer leaderboard with AIHT Ratings, pricing and detailed reviews.

More ways to compare

All comparisons →